最新评论
博客归档
-
▼
2008
(129)
-
▼
八月
(55)
- 商联帝沙股东大会
- 沙曾拨地给商联会
- 商联蒂沙资本削减 证监会未介入调查
- 商联控股风波球在陈凯希脚下？
- 商联控股捍卫会明回应
- 替 Amsteel 小股东们争取权益
- 许庆琦专程回国赴会
- 叫商联控股太沉重
- 陈凯希：静观其变
- 缪进新任商联控股董事主席
- 张福财杨耀才辞董事
- 陈钟林的夺权大计（五）―― 不可能的任务
- 陈凯希促董事公开回答
- 人财两空隐忧 陈凯希战到底
- 陈钟林的夺权大计（四）
- 陈钟林的夺权大计 （三）
- 捍卫会取得14成果
- 速设独立审计委会
- 号召设独立审委会
- 要求董事部开特大
- 缪进新料接掌控股
- 华社三头马车 痛心动辄闹翻
- 陈钟林的夺权大计 （二）
- 陈钟林的夺权大计 （一）
- 陈凯希吁董事集体辞职
- 陈凯希的废话
- 苦闷的小股东
- 林源德卸董事主席职
- 联合设委会开特大 建议重组董事部
- 颜清文：“要打架，出去打”
- 钟廷森：入董事部需考虑
- 4名董事落选
- 林源德：侮辱董事
- 董事费议案遭否决
- 商联控股股东大会掀骂战
- 等待高庭谕令 商联控股特大展延
- 吁请商联控股董事主席林源德 成立独立审计委员会调查疑问
- 商联控股和解方案出炉 ？！
- 回归历史正本清源 承认商联会对两间公司的主导权
- 一群商联控股小股东的心声
- 陈凯希要当“道德法官”
- 商联控股的疑问
- —— 再和陈凯希先生谈“民族事业”
- 请以实际行动说服我
- 商联控股风波或和解
- 大鱼吃小鱼伤害华社
- 钟廷森讥讽：如成立新党
- 陈凯希“骑劫”小股东
- 商联控股告华社书（二）
- 陈凯希申请禁令
- 民族事业是骗人的
- 华资集团儿戏做法
- 探讨商联控股风波真相晚宴
- 看陈凯希如何自圆其说（二）
- 致钟廷森公开信
-
▼
八月
(55)
8 条评论:
繆進新何仁何德任商聯控股主席？
他有意當商聯控股的掌舵人（在實權顧問顏清文之下）的話，對於理應出任此職的商聯總會長構成不敬，違反商聯會的意願，如同欺君犯上大逆不道！
請他首先辭去隆雪中華工商會署理會長職位，不好冒犯整個商聯會！
顏清文等盟友爲何不敢讓丹斯理鍾廷森領導董事局帶動改組呢？越來越多疑問，也令人相信裏面一定有古怪要掩蓋！
I remember very clearly that the reason given by Mew Jin Seng during the recent Unico Holdings Bhd's AGM why the Board of Unico has 16 members whereas large conglomerates like IOI, Genting, KLK whose boards comprise less than 10 members. The reason given was plain and simple. It is HISTORICAL and by this I assume it is also historical and traditional for the Chairman of ACCCIM to assume the Chairmanship of Unico Holdings Bhd. There is no excuse to say otherwise now. Please therefore go back to the basic practice when the Chairman of ACCCIM is also the Chairman of Unico Holdings Bhd. The reason why the Gang of 6 would like to control Unico Desa Plantations Bhd. is very simple. It is the potential of Unico Desa if we were to study the market capitalization of Unico Desa as compared to those of IOI, KLK based on market capitalization per hectare. We cannot compare Unico Desa and Sime Darby as the latter is managed as a Government Department even though it has the most plantation land bank. Another issue is the listed companies owned by the Gang of 6 are performing way below par. I would say these companies are less than mediocre. If any reader does not agree with this view, please argue this out with facts and figures. I'm only stating facts and nothing more than that.
这条狗都配当商联控股董事主席?? 这是对商联控股2万5千名股东最大的侮辱!!!!!!!
Whoever you are, I think you make a serious mistake by assuming that it is historical and traditional for the Chairman of ACCCIM to assume the Chairmanship of Unico Holdings Bhd.
It is merely your assumption, nothing more nothing less. You have not looked hard enough on the fact that Tan Sri Lim Guan Teik assumed the Chairmanship of UNICO Holdings Bhd before he was elected the Chairman of ACCCIM.
Likewise, I can legitimately suspect what Mr.Tan and his gang have done is not something altruistic.
Why they are so insistent to oust the socalled gang of 6 or whoever? They are really a bunch of crooks,to say the least.
Well, you pretend to be objective but I think you have failed miserably.
You are Tan's hitman. I am confident that this a fact as well!
另一個匿名，如果繆進新是一條狗，又當上商聯控股董事主席，那陳凯希等人無法坐上商聯控股董事主席的位子，不是連狗都不如嗎？
那對陳凱希及他的朋友是個極大的侮辱，不是所有的2萬多名股東也！！！！！！！
I refer to the above reader's comments. I'm nobody's hatchet man whatsoever. I stressed in my earlier comments it is better for facts and figures to speak otherwise it is meaningless to discuss further. It was Mew Jin Sing who touched on historical reason and if he didn't mean to imply the links between ACCCIM and Unico Holdings Bhd., then what are the so-called historical reasons. I stress again I'm not on the payroll of anybody. I speak for MYSELF and I don't claim to represent anybody including the Chinese Community. Objectively, the views expressed by the Chinese gentleman (I think he is Mr. Lee) who represented the Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group(MSWG) should be noted seriously. These comments were given professionally and are like advice given to minority shareholders in any corporate exercise.
I beg to differ, facts and figures cannot speak for themselves without human touch, that is, interpretation, the educated one on that. Fair enough, if the socalled gang of six had done any wrong within the bounds of law, let them face the music.
I think what Mr. Mew refered to is the numbers of director in UNICO holdings, which in a particular time reached 16 members. It is a historical fact. Now, it had reduced to 11 and it seems will remain so for at least one more year. This is a new historical fact. I do not think you get this one right. It is never HISTORICAL nor TRADITIONAL that the Chairman of ACCCIM is automitically the Chairman of UNICO Holdings. It is a hard fact.
I beg your pardon if you are really speak for yourself and no one else's. One more thing, we must bear in mind that speak for oneself does not mean one speaks impartially, and in this case, you said that "I'm only stating facts and nothing more than that" is an overstatement.
哈哈,你这样说等同默认缪进新是一条狗,哈哈哈哈!!!!陈凯希是被狗赶出来!哈哈哈!!!!!!
你說人家是一條狗，我不是順着你的意思羅。不過，我說“假如”，是假設。
比如我說假如我是匿名，我就是一條哈巴狗。你要當作這是默認匿名是條哈巴狗，我有啥方法？
又比如說，假如我是陳凱希，我連豬狗都不如。你要當作我默認陳凱希連豬狗都不如，我誓死都要維護你說話的權利。
對不起，我本來不想用這樣的比喻的。現在既然人家故意挑起，我不得不針鋒相對。I mean no harm。唉！
发表评论