2008年8月25日星期一

替 Amsteel 小股东们争取权益

陈凯希、周芝简、陈怀安、林国璋这4人在商联控股第26届股东大会上表演激烈,处处针对商联控股的董事,对他们做出莫须有的指责,表现恶劣,自取其辱。

金狮集团的一间公司 Amsteel Corporation Berhad的常年报告书中,指出Amsteel Corporation Berhad 在2003年的税前盈利为11亿3千9百万令吉,而在2007年,该公司的生意亏损了758万令吉。

你们4个人说商联控股是民族企业,因为它是由华资所创办的公司,那金狮集团同样也是由华裔领袖出钱所成立的公司,也应该同样肩负着民族企业的使命。在这一年内亏了这么大笔的数目,小股东们应该知道的,钱到哪里去了?!

啊!以上的四个乱人勇士(陈凯希、陈怀安、周芝简、林国璋)去探听Amsteel Corporation Berhad 何时召开股东大会,为了民族企业,你们四人应该为小股东争取利益,设法领取Proxy,到Amsteel Corporation Berhad股东大会的现场去,针对账目的问题质问大股东钟廷森,因为小股东的利益已被钟廷森挖空了。既然“好打不平”,要帮助小股东,那你们也应该一视同仁,去帮助Amsteel 的小股东才对。否则就是孬种,是伪君子。

可是在我看来,你们是不敢去的。我敢用一元打赌,你们即使吃了豹子胆,也不敢出席和钟廷森对抗,因为你们还必须依靠钟廷森照顾。

3 条评论:

匿名 说...

哈哈哈,笑料不错,大抛笑弹,好好好!
你们不如提议叫四勇士也去政党的常年大会踢场!火箭的刚过了,下个目标是马花,民政和巫统等,教导他们如何治理国家经济!这样一来,股票市场的988家公司,权益全部有保障!
颜清文呢?你们怎么漏了他,真没礼貌,他可是一位堂堂正正的大律师兼股潭大亨,少了他就三缺一拉!

匿名 说...

The guy who argued this way is an idiot as there are hundreds of Chinese majority KLSE listed companies that are bleeding. You mean these companies were incorporated because of ACCCIM? Let's concentrate on Unico and its related companies as Unico was formed owing to mass mobilizing of resources of Chinese community whereas Amsteel was not formed this way. It has no historical baggage just like what the majority owners of Hai-O Enterprise Bhd./Muda Holdings Bhd. want to do with the restructuring of Hai-O/Muda, it is their own business. I may resort to use vulgar words if you continue to argue like a moron and in an uncivilized manner. Please don't think almost all the Chinese community leaders can be misled by a few guys if no facts and figures were presented.

匿名 说...

Here you are again anonymous.

Give me a break, this is not the first time you have resorted to vulgar words. And Please, do not pretend to be an imapartial bystander.

I do not think the guy who argued that the four "warriors" should make mischief at Amsteel AGM like they had done at UNICO AGM is an idiot or moron. He simply stated a point that whatever the historically baggage the UNICO have to shoulder, an AGM should conduct according to the rules of meeting, an not the way Tan and his alliances had shown during the meeting.

You made a pertinent point. The companies you mentioned in you comment are all operated under the Company Act, why should we disciriminate one against other?

You are very very funny. UNICO is just like other companies. If Tan Sri Cheng and the others really care about ACCCIM's historical role, they should have taken up the task about six years ago when Cheng was elected Chairman of ACCCIM.

I would say that they definitely do not have the sense of history. So, what the rush to "right" UNICO Holdings and its related companies, especially UNICO-Desa.

Anonymous, be fair, does it not obvious who have argued like a moron and uncivilized manner in the first place?

“四勇士”只能是某個政黨的黨員或者無黨無派,他們要嘛以黨代表的身份在會場鬧場,要嘛以觀察員的身份旁觀,休想去踢場。還有,政黨大會沒有proxy可拿。所說,你連這基本常識都搞不通,真令人失望。

人家不建議“四勇士”到馬華、民政和巫統大會去鬧場,還有一點常識,你就沒有了。

你說的沒錯,以現在的國內政治形勢來看,“四勇士”理應義不容辭,教導他們如何治理國家經濟。

只可惜,“四勇士”有勇無謀,只能好為人師教導商聯控股如何管理公司,結果碰了滿鼻子灰。

這還不要緊,“四勇士”只有匹夫之勇,到了這個地步才知道自己能力不濟,要“外力”干涉。所以,陳老板最新的舉動是申請庭令,向證券委員會投報,現在拉了個亂人許慶琦來協助他。

顏清文至少還有個你所說的大律師,他知道法律程序和會議規矩,類似在商聯控股以及即將舉行的商聯帝沙股東代表大會的踢館,形同兒戲,他那會跟你們的“四勇士”一般見識?

那個用英文寫評論的匿名,還不知陳老板近一年來就是搞三搞四,他那里管你什么歷史包袱,要搞夸顏清文等人才真!